Make
Visual automation for power users.
Last updated
- ⭐ Best for
- ops
- 💰 Pricing
- From $9/mo
- ⏱ Hours saved/wk
- 5
- 🔥 Why trending
- 8/10 popularity
About Make
Powerful visual scenarios with branching, loops, and JSON tooling.
Key benefits
- ✓Visual scenarios
- ✓Branching
- ✓Iterators
- ✓JSON tools
Use cases
+Pros
- ✓More power per dollar than Zapier
- ✓Great for complex flows
- ✓Generous free tier
−Cons
- −Steeper learning curve
- −Smaller integration catalog
Ready to try Make?
Start free — paid plans from $9/mo.
Make vs alternatives
Same category, ranked by ToolMango ROI Score.
| Tool | ROI Score | Pricing | |
|---|---|---|---|
Makethis page Visual automation for power users. | ★★★⯨★71.3 | $9/mo | View → |
Automation that works with anything. | ★★★★★78.5 | $20/mo | View → |
Open-source workflow automation with AI. | ★★★⯨★67.8 | Free | View → |
Visual workflow automation with native AI module support. | ★★★★★55.0 | $9/mo | View → |
Code-level workflow automation with 2400+ integrations. | ★★⯨★★50.0 | $19/mo | View → |
Our take on Make
Who Make Is Actually For
Make (formerly Integromat) sits in an interesting position: more powerful than Zapier, less code-heavy than n8n. That middle ground is genuinely useful, but only if you're the right kind of user.
If you're managing complex data flows—conditional routing, looping over arrays, transforming JSON before it hits an API—Make handles these natively without requiring workarounds or premium add-ons. That's where it earns its ROI score of 71.3.
The Visual Scenario Builder
The canvas interface is Make's defining feature and its biggest barrier. Modules connect visually, and you can see data flowing between them in real time during test runs. Branching routes let you handle errors or alternate conditions without building separate zaps. Iterators let you process list items one by one.
This is powerful. It's also not intuitive on day one. Expect to spend meaningful time with the documentation before your first complex scenario runs cleanly.
Pricing vs. Competitors
At $9/month for the Core plan, Make undercuts Zapier substantially for equivalent capability. The free tier's 1,000 monthly operations is enough to automate real recurring tasks, not just toy examples. For small teams or solo operators running moderate automation volume, the value-per-dollar is hard to argue with.
Where It Falls Short
The integration catalog is the clearest weak point. Zapier connects to 6,000+ apps; Make's library is considerably smaller. If your workflow depends on a niche tool—certain HR platforms, regional payment processors, specialized marketing software—you may need to fall back on webhooks and custom HTTP modules, which requires more technical confidence.
There's also no AI-native workflow builder. Make supports AI tools through integrations (OpenAI, Anthropic via HTTP), but it doesn't generate scenarios from natural language or suggest automations based on your stack. That's a gap as competitors start adding AI-assisted setup.
Verdict
Make is the right call for technical marketers, ops leads, and developers who want Zapier-level connectivity without Zapier-level pricing—and who need real logic control. It's the wrong call if you want something running in 20 minutes without a learning investment.
Frequently asked questions
How does Make differ from Zapier?
Make uses a canvas-based scenario builder that supports branching logic, iterators, and data transformation natively. Zapier is more linear and beginner-friendly, but Make delivers significantly more control per dollar, especially for complex multi-step workflows.
Is Make's free tier actually usable?
Yes. The free plan includes 1,000 operations per month and access to most core features including branching and iterators. For low-volume personal projects or testing, it's genuinely functional—not just a trial.
What kinds of workflows is Make best suited for?
Make excels at multi-condition flows: think syncing data between CRMs and spreadsheets with error-handling branches, processing webhook payloads with JSON parsing, or orchestrating multi-app sequences that would require workarounds in simpler tools.
Where does Make fall short?
The integration catalog is smaller than Zapier's or n8n's. If your stack includes niche SaaS tools, you may hit gaps. The visual interface also has a real learning curve—new users often spend an hour just understanding how modules and routes connect.
Is Make a good fit for non-technical users?
Probably not as a starting point. If you've never built an automation before, Zapier or Pabbly Connect will get you moving faster. Make rewards users who understand data structures and are willing to invest time learning the canvas model.
Get the sweetest AI tools every week.
5 handpicked AI tools for developers, creators, and side hustlers — delivered weekly.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Use Make now
Visual automation for power users.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission.